Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pierre
This is my point, it's throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Using contractors "should" not affect the state of the network as longs as:
1) They are supervised properly.
2) Regular quality audits are undertaken.
3) Monthly or even weekly progress meeting are held.
4) Proper penalties are in place for non-conformance
If ntl choose not to police their contractors they are to blame for the state of the network.
|
Agreed
yes they got rid of the few QC people, i know for a fact the contractors in my area are reasonably payed, have all the tools test equipment provided for them and also the uniform, keys are constantly checked, they are constantly told about the things they do wrong, also when they do a good job, but still doors are left open or broken, jumpering is a joke, cable routing in cabs is a joke, the install in not done to the proper ntl spec, but hey it works at the end of it!
And yes it is NTL's fault for this