Quote:
|
Originally Posted by orangebird
Well well, the silence in response to this post is absolutely deafening....  |
No silence from me.
So-ntl (by far the larger of the 2 companies) decided to place their PVR/HD box 'on hold'...
Can someone please explain to me why that was?
If they had a great product that was on track etc, why has the TW PVR/HD service taken priority?
[Edit]-Just FYI, that news item is
6 months old.
Why did they bother telling people they had an HD service "coming soon" when they knew they would be merging soon?