Thread: Where Now For UK Cable?
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2006, 23:27   #47
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Where Now For UK Cable?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Stuart also ntl are having to support different types of networks/services because they wont integrate their services into 1 universal service, which is ultimately raising their costs and reducing quality of service.
True, although NTL are stuck between a rock and a hard place there. It costs a lot to operate all those different services, but would also cost an awful lot to upgrade

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
True, NTL's interactive services do lead an awful lot to be desired. However, I don't think that is *entirely* NTL's fault. I think the broadcasters have a lot to answer for there.
are ntl to blame if the customer has analogue only service tho? would be interested to know if interactive is possible on analogue.
Well, I did say *entirely*. I do think NTL could do a lot more to improve the customer side of interactive.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote