Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
yeah I would say you have, the first title you won without spending massive although you did still spend above the average, prising players away from other top division teams presumably you was able to offer keane and cantona superior wages to their previous clubs.
|
Today, if a club is interested in a player and Chelsea has also shown an interest, where do you think he'll end up? It was never that way with United. Shearer, Ronaldinho, there have been plenty of players who United wanted but lost out to to other clubs.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Then after the first title you started spending bigger and bigger and like nffc said if you the only difference between you and chelsea is your spending has been sustained over a number of years whilst chelsea brought a bunch of players in one go.
|
And I'm not against spending over greater lengths of time. Chelsea buying up all the best players over 2 years is what bought them success.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Look at your current squad and you telling me it cost significantly less then chelsea's to build?
|
Too right!
And the money we've spent, has it bought us the title?