View Single Post
Old 21-04-2006, 16:26   #8
bopdude
Inactive
 
bopdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Teesside
Posts: 8,315
bopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny stars
bopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny starsbopdude has a pair of shiny stars
Send a message via MSN to bopdude
Re: Moderators can be held liable court ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Depends on the time of day, Bop. Reported posts start a thread in the team area. At most times of day one of us will spot and action it well within half an hour.

Besides all this, our law has a concept of what is 'reasonable' in it. We would be unlikely to be held liable for libel over something posted at 4am and removed at 9am, for example, as we dealt with it within a reasonable time.
Thanks Chris
bopdude is offline   Reply With Quote