View Single Post
Old 10-04-2006, 08:23   #17
injuneer
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 632
injuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to beholdinjuneer is a splendid one to behold
Re: Restructure anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
I dont understand outsourcing it suppoesdbly saves cash but when you have agency staff and contractors it costs a lot of ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£ÃƒÆ ’‚£.

Agency staff = less cash to the worker but more cash to the agency then a direct employee would cost.

Contractors = more cash per hour, alot more but they dont have to be employed x amount of hours per week just pay for work rendered.
By outsourcing to a third party they pass on the responsibility for paying National Insurance and Pension provision which, they say, saves them a lot of money. It removes them from any social obligations and looks good on paper for the shareholders
injuneer is offline   Reply With Quote