View Single Post
Old 06-04-2006, 16:16   #82
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: June Price Rises?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Ok, so this was in rented property then I presume?

Then it's either yours or your landlord's/landlady's responsibility.

Either way, it's not BT's responsibility-why do you feel it should be?

Because it's their equipment.

But they left it working, so someone else has damaged it & the responsibility doesn not lie with BT (nor would it lie with ntl if it was an ntl installed property )



But ntl would surely charge you for a new installation?



Because it's not BT's responsibility-it would be yours/landlord/landlady/property owner's responsibility.



Not really, as you are not yet paying BT for a service, so it's not the same at all!

At the end of the day, BT aren't responsible.

Fact.

End of.
Right, so those that naffed off to other providers looking for greener grass that want to come back to BT can do so for nothing, but I have to pay for damage that's not mine? I don't think so. Fact.

Holy **** - BT charge £99.99 for a new line!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder they can bloody well afford to comp people.
orangebird is offline   Reply With Quote