Thread: Traffic Shaping
View Single Post
Old 05-04-2006, 19:19   #206
Chrysalis
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
Chrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronze
Chrysalis is cast in bronze
Re: Traffic Shaping

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtwn
Yes it doesn't make any sense from the outset but thats how it is. Remember, not everybody are usenet leechers like some of us

Depending on where you are across the network, on the downstream side in original areas it would either be 27mbps or 42mbps per card depending on the QAM and 38mbps in ex c&w areas. I don't know whether higher modulation is in operation in these areas.
I think sollp made a post a while back claiming the qam256 isnt been rolled out yet when I queried about mine still been qam64.

---------- Post added at 18:19 ---------- Previous post was at 18:13 ----------

Quote:
This is per downstream, not per uBR, each area can be fed more than one downstream but ntl aren't doing this at this time (Telewest are).
I missed this, so I have read on here that telewest's network is apperently worse but at least they have the decency to use multiple channels for downstream. Is their a reason for ntl to not do this, it must be cheaper then a ubr reseg.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote