Thread: Traffic Shaping
View Single Post
Old 31-03-2006, 23:58   #79
Fawkes
Inactive
 
Fawkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 48
Services: VM: 120M Broadband, TV + Landline
Posts: 471
Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Traffic Shaping

I don't have a problem with traffic shaping or caching as a way of reducing costs or improving network performance but I'm a bit of a cynic and not sure I trust some ISPs not to use it as a substitute for investment in network infrastructure.

It also feels like the thin end of the wedge.


Quote:
Why the net should stay neutral

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation is considering making changes to the 1996 Telecommunications Act, and one of the ideas being floated is that network providers should be allowed to offer preferential service to some of their customers instead of providing a neutral data carrier service.

<snip>

....once we get away from the idea that the pipes just move bits around without really caring what data is being transmitted, it's a small step to discriminating against some forms of content and then targeting specific sites, services or users.

Instead of an "end-to-end" network, we would end up with something more like the phone network, along with a complicated array of charging schemes for "0800", "0845" and "0871" sites.

Taken from here
Fawkes is offline   Reply With Quote