Thread: Traffic Shaping
View Single Post
Old 31-03-2006, 21:45   #54
Frank
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Services: Beanfield 50/50 FTTH and iPTV
Posts: 1,756
Frank has a golden auraFrank has a golden auraFrank has a golden auraFrank has a golden aura
Frank has a golden auraFrank has a golden aura
Re: Traffic Shaping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fawkes
Thats fine, until all ISP start shaping, just like most of them cap now.
And in a month or three they will start offering unshaped accounts at a higher price, its just another way to get more money out of us!
That, my friend, is why we exist. If enough people shout loud enough that they don't want shaped internet, then (according to the theory at least) we should be able to affect change.

---------- Post added at 14:45 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
I'm all for caching if it reduces costs and speeds up the network, but there are some interesting legal issues in there.
Not at all.

The Cachelogics store the 'indexes' to their data purely as hashes, same as other P2P 'clients' do.

There is no way for anyone to know exactly what's on the Cachelogics, therefore the ISPs can claim common carriage as they have no way of knowing what the boxes are storing.

If a content provider wants something removed they can, of course, ask for it to be, they just have to supply a really large hash of the file

It's more legally sound than newsgroup servers for example.
Okay great, bring them on. But this is not the same as traffic shaping.
Frank is offline   Reply With Quote