View Single Post
Old 31-03-2006, 14:36   #132
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: 10 meg unlimited?

Quote:
Originally Posted by unlimited
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
Not sure encryption will be very handy. Either only a few people will have each key, which will reduce the number of downloads available (thus slowing the download speed), or lots of P2P users will have the same key, and the ISPs may well spot a pattern, and just slow down any packets conforming to that pattern.
Suggest you check out Diffie-Hellman key exchange, TKIP, and asymmetric cryptography

The only way to stop a reasonably implemented encryption scheme is to use session / connection based throttling. There aren't exactly many applications that open as many connections as quickly as a P2P program
I don't have time to check those out now (but may well do later), but if enough people exchanged keys, surely you still run the risk of the ISP picking that up?
If its that easily defeated ?, Why would they spend the sort of money that this stuff costs. Unless its not that easy to defeat. ?


My opinion on this is it's NOT that easy to defeat.
Was that aimed at me? If it was, I was talking about the encryption being offered by P2P clients and how ISPs might detect that. Unless I am much mistaken, the various P2P authors probably don't spend that much money..
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote