lets just say I look at information certain elements in the government would prefer the people to remain ignorant about.
nothing illegal about the nature of the information althought with all this new freedom eroding legislation being shuffled through under the justification of "anti-terrorism", a lot of the information I look at can now be classed under their definition of "terrorist activites" but I'll tell you one thing, ANYTHING nowadays can potentially come under the THEIR definition of terrorist.
So basically, I want to ensure that I do not get in to legal trouble for looking at information that is utterly harmless yet can potentially come under anti terror laws - becuase it's meant to be that way becuase they want a police state.
Do you understand me?
Some examples of information that can now come under the definition of "terrorist activiteis"...
http://www.threeworldwars.com/index.html
http://s13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/
www.rinf.com
... basically anything that presents a view that contradicts the "official line".
Like I said, harmless, and I do not want to potentially get in trouble for viewing it.