View Single Post
Old 11-03-2006, 13:30   #102
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Gypsy's - Human Rights - What about us?

Quote:
Originally Posted by basa
In any event I think squatting should be illegal to prevent rogues from obtaining property without working for it. Proviso> There should be adequate provision available through legal means, e.g. council accommodation.
I honestly don't know if squatting should be made illegal, there are pros and cons to the arguments on both sides. What I do agree with entirely is the fact that rogues should not be allowed to benefit.

Adequate provision is a finely balanced thing. One of the problematic areas being that if all councils and local authorities are to be held on this then obviously there will be shortcomings in other areas of services which they are expected to provide.

Another problem is the desire of travellers to be nomadic and not tied to any one place or demographic. The points that Xaccers makes are quite pertinent to this.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote