Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
You just don't get it, do you? I pointed out that you changed the title of the BBC report to facilitate your attack on "pikeys", it's simple.
|
Now you're talking complete cr*p, since you can see on the BBC website it says 'Gypsy'. I didn't hack the BBC website.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
No, you didn't. What you did was edit and reproduce the headline of a BBC report - the general jist of which appealed to your own prejudices - with a simple manipulation of the headline's wording..
|
So now I'm not entitled to choose my own title for a CF thread?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
You didn't even bother to read the ruling which they even went to the bother of making available on line
|
There was no ruling at the time of the OP. You're now so far up your own arrse you can't see clearly any more.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Not according to the ruling and judgement - see my earlier post of part seven thereof where it clearly states (in court documents no less) that the ownership and title of the land was not in question.
|
If that was the case then why did they illegally occupy land they did not own?
BTW - I wasn't referring to the case, but the simple fact that they did question the ownership and title by their own actions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Well, you could try opening your eyes before letting your preprejudice expose you.
|
And once again you avoid answering a simple question.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
I'm not saying you cant - I'm saying you shouldn't
|
Excuse me, but when you're calling me a racist, bigot and nazi I thing you're going a little further than saying I shouldn't.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
I'm not - go and read your posts again - you have, clearly, grouped all travellers, gypsys and romanys along with your disdain for "pikeys".
|
I don't have to re-read my posts - I know exactly what I said. Until YOU came along and started calling me racist and twisting my words they were quite clear.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Pathetic! Now you're trying to tell me you can't even remember what you posted on a forum over the last two days - go have a read of some of the bile you've been spouting on this thread. Those "descriptions" were used by you - not me.
|
Yes, I have used some pretty strong words to describe pikeys. That's because they make the lives of ordinary, decent people a misery.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
See my point above - you think of them all as the same - go and re-read your posts.
|
YOU have decided that I think they're all the same. I have never said anything to suggest that, except in your tiny mind.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Since you ask, and have a penchant for enquiring after alternatives and proof, then please tell me how else you would suppose anyone might interpret your prejudice?
|
They can interpret it as extreme hatred for all pikeys that camp illegally, steal, drive illegal stolen cars and then leave a mess when they finally move on. I believe that is a clear interpretation of my 'prejudice'?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
If you're going to espouse opinions you'd best be prepared for discussion and to take on board the fact that there is no room for your type of prejudice in modern society. It should, and will, be challenged at every opportunity.
|
I don't think you're living in the same society as the rest of us then, because as far as I can tell, my 'prejudice' towards pikeys is shared by the vast majority of the population of England. If it wasn't, then we wouldn't be having this discussion at all, because then we'd see every town in England welcoming them onto their bowling greens for them to camp on.
BTW - a definition of prejudice goes as follows:
Quote:
|
a preformed opinion, usually an unfavorable one, based on insufficient knowledge, irrational feelings, or inaccurate stereotypes
|
Now we're not dealing with inaccurate stereotypes here - I have SEEN what a pikey encampment looks like.
So it's not insufficient knowledge either - I KNOW what mess they leave behind - I have SEEN it.
Nor are my feelings irrational - it is well known that crime rates increase when pikeys set up camp.
Therefore, my antipathy towards pikeys is NOT prejudicial.