|
Re: Schoolboy not allowed to protect himself?
We don't really know very much about the background to this, do we?
For starters, we don't know if there was a real danger of someone attacking the boy with a knife, or whether he was simply making an unnecessary gesture.
We also don't know the reason he felt he might be attacked with a knife: he might be threatening others with a knife himself, and using the vest to give himself what many might feel to be an unfair advantage in this situation.
I'm not saying either of these scenarios are appropriate; simply that we don't know what the background to this actually is.
|