Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
You talking to me?
|
Apologies, unintentional.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
You are absolutely right. I'm sure the suffering you went through to point that out was bareable.
|
It would be considerably more bearable if it were to produce a factual answer rather than a predisposition to a racist attitude which seems unrelenting even when confronted with the law of the land.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
Except you ARE going around in circles and you ARE continuing to accuse me of racism, yet it is quite plain that there is NO racism involved in this debate - except in your head!
|
I'm sorry, but that was a point of law which I quoted earlier - not my opinion or something in my "head". You obviously have a problem in understanding that.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
If I offend a pikey, then I willnot apologise for it - after all THEY don't apologise for being anti-social.
|
It's a secular, fascist attitude like this which prevents any progress in modern socety. "Two wrongs don't make a right"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
My only generalisation is that the thieving, anti-social, morons that camp on public land ARE pikeys. Therefore, it is also clear that any travellers that are "law abiding and successful members of the travelling community who integrate well with the settled society" are NOT included in that generalisation.
|
Why didn't you make that particular distinction / generalization earlier? The burglars who broke into my house and stole my car several weeks ago - they didn't camp on public land. Based on your rationale - should I advise CID to rule out "Pikeys" from their initial line of enquiries? Please advise.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
I will not tolerate pikeys.
|
That generalization pretty much substantiates my previous assertion that your tendancies are more racist and preprejudiced than formed from any type of proven social interaction or personal experiences(s).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
travellers/gypsies that stick to legal and social rueles - fine. Live and let live, I say.
|
Hooray!! for you - However, there's something ironic about someone espousing the sociological merits of a particular group who "stick" to legal rules (that's a new concept - "legal rules" - here on planet earth we call "legal rules" "the law") when they themselves would question the validty of tenets of law quoted to them.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
No at all. You've been going on, and on about racism where there was none. Whatever point you were trying to make has been lost in your attempt to whitewash the pikeys.
|
My earlier quote from the Race Relations Act refers, as indeed do comments attributable to, and by, you which have been made and published in the context of this thread.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
You are the only one to have twisted words. You attributed racism where there was none.
|
See above.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
No, but all pikeys are pikeys.
|
This is not in dispute.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
Maybe there are other people who do some of these things sometimes (Really? Do you seriously think so?) - only pikeys do ALL of them all of the time. To what question? I've responded to everything you've posted. Even the stupid attempts at trying to bring racism into the debate.
BTW - you have so far avoided answering a single of my questions.
|
I don't actually recall you asking a direct question - I may be wrong - but I seem to recall that anything you have mooted on this subject, including the thread title, you have put forward as a statement of fact without any substantive evidence to endorse same.
If you're intent on arguing then please at least make the effort. Otherwise, if you've a question to ask, feel free to do so.