Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
"I myself contacted ntl on a personal level and asked for this to be reconsidered and as a direct result of this and feedback posted, ntl have notified me this afternoon that they have had a change of heart and will be cancelling the downgrade service charge." What part of that, your own quote, do you not understand as a claim?
|
Erm - That is not a claim - it is a fact-end of.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
You still haven't explained. What is the difference between "not yet implemented" and "proposed"?
|
I have. Look at that page!!!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Again, Hooray!! for you. It may, quite possibly, have escaped your notice - but I'm not in the least bit interested in these issues.
|
Tough - I brought these to your attention whether you was interested or not because you are ignorant to the fact that ntl do take notice of what is posted on this forum and make operational changes where they can. They have in the past and have done on this occasion. I am not trumpet blowing, just merely proving to you that you would have lost your money, putting it on the law regarding the downgrade charge being cancelled.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
The reason I entered the discussion on this matter was to highlight the illegal nature of a proposed "late payment" charge (a legal fact).
|
Everytime you say proposed I am going to correct you - It's not proposed the charges are going ahead.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
I'm not interested in your self effacing trumpet blowing - I deal with facts - legal facts.
|
If you say so.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Again, I don't see the point of me having to reiterate the fact that these proposed charges are illegal (the law and respective jurisprudence in this jurisdiction has already proven that they are illegal). Which part of this do you not understand?
|
It hasn't proven anything to me - that case that was highlighted is a different set of circumstances, like any court case would be. In your opinion they are illegal. BTW - It's not proposed, the charges are going ahead.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Since you seem to be so well connected, and seem intent on espousing this forum as a direct catalyst for decisions made at the highest echelons of NTL, why don't you invite the Company Secretary to come to this forum and debate his interpretation of the the legalities of the proposed charges with me?
|
I might well do that but I doubt he would want to waste time debating with someone who would argue that
black is white.
---------- Post added at 09:20 ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Martyn
Can some one please confirm for me.
Does this mean there is no more monthly fees.. e.g the old 15£ a month?
|
The one off charge is relating to an installation charge to have a second box installed.