View Single Post
Old 24-02-2006, 10:01   #3
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: extradition without evidence-uncle sam wants you!

Eh?

Two UK justices, including a lord justice for the appeals court, have ruled that the extradition should happen. What's the point in having our own judicial system if you are going to dismiss it everytime a judge rules against your opinion?

Quote:
He said the facts disclosed "a significant United States dimension to the whole case.
Doesn't sound like no evidence to me...

The extradition treaty was revised shortly after sept. 11th 2001. Does that mean everyone extradited until the law revised is terror related? Of course not.

And about this whole "surrendering our justice system to the Americans"... What country surrenders anything? Its all give and take. If we tilted the extradition in favour of the Americans, you can bet we got something just as good in return. Even if its exactly how you say, its not shame on the US for doing it, its shame on poxy Labour for being mug enough to accept it.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote