Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Nice piece of cherry picking Xaccers,
|
Please use the quotes tag.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Why is the west not at war with Saudi Arabia where the majority of the hijackers came from or is this a sort of "pick and choose" war on terror?
|
Was it sanctioned by King Fahd? No.
Were the 9/11 bombers working for the Saudi monarchy, or did some of them happen to just be Saudi citizens? That would be the latter wouldn't it?
Is the Saudi monarchy and ally to Al Qeada or a foe? That would be foe, after King Fahd chose the allied forces to protect Saudi Arabia against Saddam during the first gulf war.
So, considering the Saudi's are fighting Al Qaeda, why on earth would the US go to war with them?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
No. But then again are the colateral, non military, deaths of innocent civilians caught in a war "going about their business" in Iraq, Afghanistan or wherever not evil actions also?
|
Any deliberate targetting of civilians not participating in combat is evil.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
Remarkable, I don't recall the ANC who swept to power, ever denouncuing their, or his, actions.
|
That wasn't the question you asked.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
They funded him and trained him. Now they feign shock at his actions? Come on.
|
And at no point did Western goverments consider him a freedom fighter.
Nor are they shocked at his actions.
He's been anti-west since at least 1991.
Surely you knew that?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr Angry
We don't all have your remarkable insight - nor am I discussing anything beyond the photographs published in the Danish papers and the fact that they, as reported worldwide beyond Leighton Buzzard, were the catalyst for the current protests.
|
You have google though right?
I'm pretty sure that it's available in your neck of the woods, and not just Leighton Buzzard.