View Single Post
Old 15-02-2006, 19:44   #9
Chrysalis
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,050
Chrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronze
Chrysalis is cast in bronze
Re: Nottingham Core......crumbling?

I am surprised noone has picked up on 195.66.224.220

Although you the first person who can compete against me for been on a crappy ubr, the 195.66.224.220 router is defenitly the main problem concerning the packet loss.

Tracing route to 213.251.146.93 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 13 ms 40 ms 11 ms UBR [10.8.143.254]
2 23 ms 119 ms 36 ms leic-t2cam1-a-ge914.inet.ntl.com [82.3.35.149]
3 36 ms 7 ms 9 ms leic-t2core-a-ge-220-0.inet.ntl.com [82.3.33.10
4 30 ms 13 ms 50 ms lee-bb-a-so-220-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.110]
5 12 ms 24 ms 11 ms nth-bb-b-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.101]
6 15 ms 12 ms 22 ms nth-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.117]
7 16 ms 40 ms 18 ms gfd-bb-b-so-400-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.98]
8 21 ms 19 ms 18 ms redb-ic-1-as0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.138]

no packet loss up to this point just fluctuations

9 121 ms 128 ms * sw1.tc.lon [195.66.224.220]
10 123 ms 124 ms 123 ms rdb-1-m1.routers.ovh.net [213.251.130.14]
11 124 ms 105 ms 104 ms 213.251.146.93

hop 9 onwards consistent 100+ ms and some packet loss.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote