Well I now have a SACM and these are my speeds:
Quote:
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:42:39 GMT
1st 128K took 141 ms = 929589 Bytes/sec = approx 7734 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 125 ms = 1048576 Bytes/sec = approx 8724 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 62 ms = 2114065 Bytes/sec = approx 17589 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 157 ms = 834854 Bytes/sec = approx 6946 kbits/sec
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:44:48 GMT
1st 128K took 79 ms = 1659139 Bytes/sec = approx 13804 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 110 ms = 1191564 Bytes/sec = approx 9914 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 79 ms = 1659139 Bytes/sec = approx 13804 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 157 ms = 834854 Bytes/sec = approx 6946 kbits/sec
|
Now to get my router connected
---------- Post added at 13:56 ---------- Previous post was at 13:44 ----------
Right, router in the loop:
Quote:
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:51:32 GMT
1st 128K took 188 ms = 697191 Bytes/sec = approx 5801 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 219 ms = 598502 Bytes/sec = approx 4980 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 156 ms = 840205 Bytes/sec = approx 6991 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 250 ms = 524288 Bytes/sec = approx 4362 kbits/sec
|
.....has slowed things down......about twice as fast as my stb but slower than a SACM on it's own nevertheless.
I have a
netgear wgr614 (version 1) ....anyone got any ideas?
