View Single Post
Old 08-02-2006, 14:44   #7
Paul
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 62
Services: Aquiss FTTP (900M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 29,826
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Re: Caching Nameserver?

Completely pointless I would have thought, certainly in modern windows (2000/xp) as the dns resolver caches the results anyway.

---------- Post added at 14:44 ---------- Previous post was at 14:42 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by lordy
The good thing about a local nameserver is that it syncs with the root servers directly. No middleman. So you should get dns updates a bit quicker?
Would you like to explain that - how would a local dns server not behave exactly like any other dns server.
__________________

Baby, I was born this way.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote