View Single Post
Old 04-02-2006, 14:17   #146
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Should they be published in the UK?

Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
Seen them at Digitalspy it has a thread with the link (yes a lefty site like that)



Freedom of speech are you extracting the urine. Freedom of speech is fine no one has a problem with that apart from Muslims. They have banners with "Massacre those who insult islam", "new 7/7 attacks", "I Love al-Qaeda", "Whoever insults a prophet, kill him", "Britain you will pay †” 7/7 is on its way", "Behead those who insult Islam", "Europe †” take some lessons from 9-11", "Europe you will pay", "UK go to hell"

and your favorite "Free speech go to hell"


Is that what you dont like me criticising Mr Angry
For the record, I don't have an issue with you criticizing anything. I was simply asking for some clarification.

Where do you draw the line though?

If, as you say, "Freedom of speech is fine" then it has to be equally applied. There is no such thing as "good" or "bad" freedom of speech and you cannot cherry pick.

Freedom of speech is, last time I checked, a fundamental right in Britain. That you, I or anyone else might disagree with the placards and the expressions thereon is irrelevant to the freedom of speech argument - unless it comes down to a "do we or don't we allow freedom of speech" debate. Currently we do.

The unfortunate thing about Freedom of speech, as we are witnessing now, is that it's very much a case of "If you can't take it then don't dish it out."

Peace out.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote