View Single Post
Old 16-10-2003, 22:12   #34
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,952
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: NTL to block port 135

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellwear
So when I suggested it and was shot down with people saying that it was a really stupid idea, I was in fact right.

If this is so why on earth was it not implemented earlier???
It is not a great idea because it will cut of some of microsoft's services (uncommonm though they maybe).

Mircosoft should never have left the port open in the first pace, they should have included the option of opening it only when necessary.

Although now I admit the best thing to do is probably Ntl block it.
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote