View Single Post
Old 12-01-2006, 11:43   #52
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: What is Iran up to?

Quote:
So which country is more likely to resort to nuclear weapons - the one that can fight a conventional war or the one that can't?
1) A country with nuclear weapons
2) A country with a first use doctrine for the use of tactical nuclear weapons

Both conditions are satisfied by the USA*. Neither are satisfied by Iran. Iran is at far higher risk of being on the end of a nuclear strike than either Israel or the USA. In that situation, wouldn't you want to even things up by having a few nukes of your own?

This isn't an argument for proliferation, incidentally, it's an argument for disarmament and diplomacy. The current crop of Dr. Strangelove clones in the Pentagon is not a recipe for anyone's security and you're a fool if you think otherwise.

* Didn't you know that one of Rumsfeld's changes to US doctrine is that tac nukes can be used first? The new US Ambassador to the UN is keen on it, too.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote