Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
Why?
|
Because there are too many question marks haging over too many aspects of the whole incident. And few have ever been satisfactorily explained. (e.g. the 'magic bullet' etc.)
Oswalds
lone guilt is not
beyond reasonable doubt.
---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:17 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Maybe the mob employed him to do the deed.They have been presented as possibly wanting JFK out of their hair.Then Ruby killed Oswald to make sure he didn't talk.  |
And maybe they didn't. In which case Ruby would have no real reason to kill Oswald - at least not in front of the whole world plus dozens of policemen.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Actuaully I don't believe in any conspiracy plot...
|
In which case, which explanation works for you? (And doesn't leave you with any unresolved riddles.)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
It's just that JFK's death was so truamatic for the USA and the world that they/we had to go looking for a conspiracy theory.
|
I'm not sure they went looking for a conspiracy - at first it seemed simple - Oswald done it. But then, when people started looking at it in detail, doubt was thrown up.
It's that doubt that lead to people believing in a conspiracy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Just like they did with Diana.
|
Yeah - because of the doubt over the driver. Because of the doubt over the filthy papparazzi.