View Single Post
Old 27-12-2005, 12:12   #26
hokkers999
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 416
hokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to beholdhokkers999 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Why only 512Kbps upload? Why not 1Mbps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyssUnderground
Well there is the problem you see. I just dont have £55 a month to spare. And Id rather is wasnt co-located either. The whole reason of me having a server at home is that its easier to transfer large changes to the site and files. FTP is slow enough as it is on 200Kbps upload.

I have about 2GB of main website data and over 70gb of other files that need to be on the server too. As you can imagine it would take a hell of a long time to send over FTP.
Seems like the solutions quite simple really 1. BUY a business line. 2. Keep the 70gig stored locally 3. Upload only the CHANGES Of course, it could be that you really need to upload 70 GIG of graphics files on a regular basis. Yeah right. I shoot 16bit raw and a tiff file is only 35meg, so that's 2000 of those images. Of course when they are shrunk from 3000x2000x24bit to WEB images lets say they shrink to 3meg (trying to give you the benfeit of the doubt here) then that's only 20000 images. @ 350k/image that's 200000 of them. Who are you trying to kid.
hokkers999 is offline   Reply With Quote