Cable Forum - View Single Post

Rone · 17-12-2005, 09:55

And again:
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:53:04 UTC
1st 128K took 984 ms = 133203 Bytes/sec = approx 1108 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 609 ms = 215225 Bytes/sec = approx 1791 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 594 ms = 220660 Bytes/sec = approx 1836 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1266 ms = 103532 Bytes/sec = approx 861 kbits/sec

Oi mr NTL, can i at least have the 3meg i pay for?
I know its "up to 10 meg" it didnt say anywhere "often less than you had".

17-12-2005, 09:55	#72
Rone Inactive Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Manchester South Services: BB XL Posts: 718	Re: [Merged] Manchester Issues And again: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:53:04 UTC 1st 128K took 984 ms = 133203 Bytes/sec = approx 1108 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 609 ms = 215225 Bytes/sec = approx 1791 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 594 ms = 220660 Bytes/sec = approx 1836 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 1266 ms = 103532 Bytes/sec = approx 861 kbits/sec Oi mr NTL, can i at least have the 3meg i pay for? I know its "up to 10 meg" it didnt say anywhere "often less than you had".