Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
Referee's decisions should, of course, be subject to "peer review" ie if other refs or the FA think someone's biased towards a particular club (which I think is usually simply a case of bad luck or sour grapes) or is making a lot of bad decisions, they should be told to sort their act out or stop refereeing, but that's not the same as querying every decision made on the *at the time* that it is made.
|
They already are. In the past premiership refs have been demoted to lower league games after bad performances.
---------- Post added at 11:15 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sherer
think one of the problems is that the refs seems to have clue about football or what is going on on the pitch
during the United game at the end Rio have a minor bit of contact on the keeper with a shoulder barge.. although it was more like bumping into someone while walking down the street.. the keeper went down adn then asked for treatment ??? he fell on the grass and there was no real contact anyway.. anyone who knows anything about football or even real life knows he was acting but he was still allowed to get away with it
how cn any ref believe he was injured and needed treatment ?
|
Unforunately you never know.
A few years ago I was playing in my usual midfield general role
and I slide in to tackle a player, won the ball and I thought there was very little contact. That player went down and was rolling around in pain, I told him to get up as did some other of my teammates who thought he was playacting as it seemed an innocuous challange. It turned out that whatever way he fell he ruptured his ACL.