View Single Post
Old 20-11-2005, 18:43   #14
patrickp
Inactive
 
patrickp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: in the groove
Posts: 897
patrickp has reached the bronze age
patrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze agepatrickp has reached the bronze age
Re: NTL: email addresses obtained by spammers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nedsram
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickp
I notice you've taken care to obfuscate your own email address ("foo.bar at entee-ell.com") in this. Why is that?
I took the trouble to post details of what is in my view a serious violation of email rules, as well as an apparent security breach. I also published the headers in the hope that it would help somebody to track down the source of these messages. In return I get flamed.

For your information, the email address I obfuscated wasn't mine - I was in the bcc list. As for the other email address you mentioned, I can assure you that it is genuine. Have you perhaps considered that the owner may have had her PC infiltrated, and is unaware of this?

I won't be reading - or contributing to - this thread again. Thanks to everybody else for the useful discussions.

Brian

My point about the email address was, I thought, quite obvious - not that you shouldn't have obscured it, but to ask again, if not directly, why you found it necessary to post someone's (who was clearly _not_ the author of the spam email) email address in full in a public forum.

If you want to complain about receiving spam, fine. If you want to post about ntl selling on email addresses, I think you're wrong, but but I have no problems with you arguing the point. But posting people's email addresses in a public forum is _not_ acceptable behaviour for me, and I have to say that I think the less of you for throwing a temper tantrum rather than simply taking it on board and refraining from doing it again. I had pointed out to you once before that this is not an appropriate thing to post.
patrickp is offline   Reply With Quote