Quote:
|
Originally Posted by simpsonsFAN
I am telling you that the signal that reaches your NTL set top box is exactly the same as would be recived with a satalite reciver or freeview set top box, if you *could* dump the raw digital video to your hard drive and look at the ones and zeros there would be *no* inconsistancys. Therefore, if you are saying that one platform gives a "better picture" than another - you must have something incorrectly configured at your end.Im telling you how it works and you are dismissing it, possibly because your paying more for sky than you would be with NTL for an equivalant service and are still trying to find ways to justifiy it to your self - its a mind thing 
-Chris |
It is not a mind thing at all, it is a fact as I see it, regardless of the tech speak, if the end product does not do it for me then I do not take cost in to consideration, as far as I am aware the ntl stb was set up correctly, but it was extremely slow, which is a fault in ntl anyway, but as for picture quality, the end product regardless of the tech spiel, it is crap imo compared to sky+, and even picture quality issues aside, sky+ still blows anything ntl can offer right now out the water.
You dont need to look for reasons why I dont agree with what you say is the gospel truth, my eyes tell me the truth, not what is written down on a specification sheet.
Being a hifi enthusiast I know to pay some attention to the tech details, but at the end of the day its how I hear the results, for comparing visual differences you just do the reverse, use your own eyes, its amazing the senses we were given, and given that I had an eye test a few months ago, specsavers is one place I dont need to visit
use that time to take in a footy game on sky interactive with fantastic picture quality, did I mention interactive? oh yes I did
