Originally Posted by ian@huth

I always thought that successful companies prospered because they gave their customers what they want at a price that they like. I thought that competition enabled those objectives to be met. I now realise that I was wrong and that government legislation should level the playing field so that companies who don't give their customers what they want at the right price shall not be disadvantaged.

Non-smokers would still have the choice of 30 pubs to go to but I know that you will counter that by saying they are excluded from all because there is no smoke free sections in any of them. Perhaps they should all be forced to have a sealed no-smoking room or outhouse with its own bar and non-smoking staff to cater for their needs. In the interests of fairness I would make the point that non-smokers having a 1 in 30 chance of finding a smoke free pub would be in a better position than smokers who would have no choice of pub where they are allowed to drink, socialise and have a smoke.

You are forgetting the third and IMHO better choice that pub owners should be free to decide whether smoking is allowed or not. Logic appears to have vanished from the dictionary of some people who are against something that cannot possibly harm them if they take their rightful decision not to enter a place where smoking is allowed.