Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clarie
I don't know what you're talking about any more but that's ok cos I don't think you do either...
|
I was comparing two things and demonstrating that the exposure to the risks is in my hands, you, well you were going off in a tangent, possibly because you didn't want to admit that my point was correct, possibly for other unknown reasons...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by clarie
Which proves that only a blanket ban would work, because otherwise we will not be able to have a choice of smoking or non-smoking pubs.
|
The new law however would force pubs which serve food to either go non-smoking (and lose business, maybe even go out of business) or go non-feeding.
So rather than having a no-smoking area where people who don't wish to participate in passive smoking can go and eat and drink, and a smoking area for everyone else, you get a pub which is smoking only, and does not serve food, so a lot of people are now drinking on empty stomachs.
So as a non-smoker who doesn't want to go into any building where a cigarette could be lit, you still won't want to!
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Russ D
Well point it at someone else then!!
|
I was responding to the information you provided because no one else has provided it, sorry if it came across as otherwise Russ