Quote:
Originally Posted by punky
I know, you've already said that... Laws will be there if the pub allows smoking or not. Wether a pub allows smoking or not, things like fire escapes and fire extinguishers will be covered.
People should be able to make an informed descision on what they will and won't do. Some jobs are riskier than others. Some lifestyles are riskier than others. Let people decide. People should be encouraged to avoid/quit altogether smoking, not having it forced upon them by an opressive government.
I like atm having the opportunity to choose wether I sit with smokers or non-smokers. I resent having that basic human right of freedom of choice restricted.
Of course, choice, which is what free market capitalism allows for doesn't go down with with your average socialist (i.e. oppressive and authoritiarian) government.
|
I know I said it before, but then you made the point about free markets before. This whole thread is orbiting round and round the same core issues.
Something else I've said before is to draw the parallel with road traffic law. Do you resent the curtailment of your right to choose to drive at 90mph through a built-up area while steaming drunk, or do you agree that it is acceptable to curtail freedom of choice when there are larger health and safety issues at stake?