View Single Post
Old 01-11-2005, 14:36   #643
clarie
not here
 
clarie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 648
clarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpack
Re: smoking and the pub

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlackDad
Nicely avoided my point about the actual effect that this ban will have on the health of people who actually spend in time pubs etc. where smoking is allowed, and the negative effects of secondary smoke. I suggest that any effect will be quite minimal.
No grounds to claim it will be minimal, and any such study would take 50 years to complete as Chris T has said. We already know that passive smoking is dangerous, is there any need to quantify exactly how much we will be reducing the dangers by banning it in public places? Any reduction is good.
clarie is offline   Reply With Quote