Quote:
Originally Posted by SlackDad
Hardly what you claimed earlier
|
It's exactly what I claimed earlier - here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Logic dictates that if my exposure to passive smoking is removed (by way of a ban or whatever) then that will make a HUGE difference to my chances of contracting an illness from it.
|
And what I posted above:
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
No exposure (which would be the result of a ban) to smoke = no passive smoking for non-smokers.
|
So you see, it's exactly what I claimed earlier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlackDad
but still nicely misses my point.
|
To be honest mate, I think just about everyone is missing your point...