View Single Post
Old 01-11-2005, 13:42   #621
SlackDad
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 805
SlackDad has reached the bronze age
SlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze age
Re: smoking and the pub

Quote:
Originally Posted by clarie
It is one of a list of reasons, and I doubt you could find anyone who likes the smell of smoke on their clothes.

I would be happy for a total ban. But at the moment that doesn't seem to be on the cards so all we can do is take steps towards it.

It seems you are not against the ban but don't consider it to be enough?
I don't think I would suport a total ban but at least would show the government was serious about public health and would be grounded in supportive research.

Quote:
Originally Posted by etccarmageddon
I've never been out and then come home and had my cloths stink of car fumes!!!
Have you ever been out in London?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ D
Logic dictates that if my exposure to passive smoking is removed (by way of a ban or whatever) then that will make a HUGE difference to my chances of contracting an illness from it.
Logic perhaps, but what about research. And are you so confident that the difference will be HUGE?
SlackDad is offline   Reply With Quote