View Single Post
Old 31-10-2005, 15:14   #566
clarie
not here
 
clarie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 648
clarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpack
Re: smoking and the pub

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
They could ban cars in town centres to stop the passive intake of car fumes, quite easily just make it so that anyone driving into a citry centre has to have an electric car.
How is that easy? It's nowhere near as easy as saying right, stop smoking indoors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
I don't see where there is a difference, if they were to announce a series of initiatives where they were to address all of the carcinogens in the atmosphere then I would support a total smoking ban. But they're not
I can't understand your logic. Yes I agree it would be much better if we were to address all carcinogens in the atmosphere, but as we are not, surely it is better to attack the one we are??

If you want rid of cancer provoking poisons, why refuse to support a ban on smoking on the principle that not all carcinogens are being considered? All the time you are resting on your principles, people are continuing to puff out smoke into the air...
clarie is offline   Reply With Quote