View Single Post
Old 28-10-2005, 11:45   #386
SlackDad
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 805
SlackDad has reached the bronze age
SlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze ageSlackDad has reached the bronze age
Re: smoking and the pub

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Of course it was. I have said repeatedly over the past couple of days that the affects of alcohol do not in any way detract from the affects of tobacco smoke, and what is under discussion here is whether we should clamp down on smoking tobacco. To imply that the people who are merely sticking to the subject are the ones pursuing an agenda or skewing the discussion is perverse.

If you want to start a campaign for alcohol awareness, obesity awareness, drug abuse or whatever, then please do. If you want to start threads on any or all of the above, be my guest. I expect I will fully support what you have to say. But *none* of it will in any way diminish the danger of tobacco smoke, and the only issue under discussion here is what should be done about tobacco smoking.
But as I have said in a previous post smoking cannot be dealt with in isolation from other factors because they are linked. If this is not true then why is it that smoking rates among those most disadvantaged have not declined.
SlackDad is offline   Reply With Quote