View Single Post
Old 25-10-2005, 11:43   #145
clarie
not here
 
clarie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 648
clarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpackclarie has a very nice sixpack
Re: smoking and the pub

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangebird
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarie
Once an alternative is brought into the market for petrol-run cars, then we'll talk.
There are already alternatives, LPG and electric just two of them. So, those who drive petrol cars are poisoning you, and they have the CHOICE not to. Want to talk about that now? In another thread of course.
Yes but they are not widely available are they? And they're not cheap. The people who poison me with cigarettes are actually paying for the privilege of doing so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangebird
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarie
Smoking is something that we all know carries a very high risk to the health. And at the moment we have a choice to reduce that risk.
Yes, by voluntarily giving up. Not being bullied by a nanny state. Where's the choice for business owners to decide what their customers do on their own premises?
I was referring to passive smoking. I am not suggesting you should be forced into giving up. That, as you say, should be voluntary. But I don't think that prohibiting smokers from poisoning non-smokers with their smoke is 'bullying', it's just sensible.
clarie is offline   Reply With Quote