View Single Post
Old 21-10-2005, 15:21   #30
Pierre
cf.mega poster
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,347
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Victory for Common Sense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Ah. So it's an opinion.

Please don't present it as a fact then.
Sorry didn't realise I had to qualify all of my statements with IMO or :fact:

Sorry, I thought we were having a discussion

I note you'd rather address the issue of whether I was expressing opinion rather than fact (when I thought it was fairly obvious it was opinion) that address the that post or subsequent post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre
Exactly, is your definition the same as the courts. If you lay your hands on somebody, forcebly grip or grab them, causing harm - That is assault.

Now before we veer off on tangent.

My point was that Teachers will be given the power to use reasonable force to restrain a child in class. The level of restraint could be taken assault. But teachers wont be prosecuted for it.

However if a parent used the same level as force they could be.

Which was the meaning of that line in my opening post
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote