View Single Post
Old 20-10-2005, 07:54   #24
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Congestion Charge - Tax or Service?

Further to this, the Germans are refusing to pay because their embassy is in the extension zone (basically a chunk from Knightsbridge to Notting Hill) - that's not the case with the US. Bangladesh manage to pay. The US owe £150,00 0, having refused to pay since the price went up (which suggests that they were happy with it at £5/day).

Also, the Vienna Convention doesn't quite say 'no taxes on embassies', it's 'no obligation to pay the host nation unless a specific benefit is rendered'. In this case, the argument would be that, since the embassy benefits directly from cleaner air and 30% less traffic on the roads in central London, they're getting a direct benefit from CC and thus should pay.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote