Thread: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion (Part 3)
View Single Post
Old 19-10-2005, 15:37   #341
jrhnewark
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,267
jrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of society
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion (Part 3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Posts by others on this forum who have had a warning letter seem to support the assumption that NTL is using 150Gb as the trigger point. That's not to say they won't get round to less serious offenders in time though. Maybe they are just targeting the serious bandwidth hogs and warez monkeys for now.
I'd certainly agree with that. We haven't had the 'test case' (so to speak) of anyone on 1Mbps with a 3GB cap who's been knocked onto 512kbps, though, as of yet.

Where the trigger lays there, I don't know. Although it would appear - at the moment - that those of us who use 30GB a month on 1Mbps have nothing to worry about.
jrhnewark is offline