View Single Post
Old 19-10-2005, 13:31   #18
Nugget
Inactive
 
Nugget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 51
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,211
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Re: Congestion Charge - Tax or Service?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaredWebWarrior
I just knew something like that was going to come up

If these were built with public money, then having to pay for them is a tax too. I wonder if the Americans would refuse to pay for the use of them?
But it's still not a tax or, as I said earlier, they are voluntary at their worst level.

I can't speak for the Dartford Bridge because I don't use it very often, but the Humber Bridge is a toll bridge because they have to pay off the debt acquired through building it. Now, it was built for the convenience of, for example, people who lived in Grimsby but worked in Hull who, instead of having a 75 mile journey, now have a 30 mile journey.

People are paying for the convenience of saving themselves an extra 45 miles. However, if they don't want to pay the toll, they have the choice of going the long way round. As such, I still don't see why anyone would think any of these are taxes.

As I said earlier, the congestion charge is purely voluntary - if you don't want to pay it, don't drive through the congestion zone. Sometimes, and there are examples given onhere, this isn't practical but this is the exception rather than the rule.
Nugget is offline   Reply With Quote