View Single Post
Old 18-10-2005, 23:16   #52
KenK
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 560
KenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to allKenK is a name known to all
Re: PVR for NTL

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob_builder
I would expect new-NTL to have to settle down before launching a new product across its whole network (orig-NTL, ex-C&W and ex-Telewest).
2008, then?

Quote:
Originally Posted by testcard
ntl choice of vod over pvr is about revenue not customer choice.
<snip>
Pvr requires investment and pay back will long term.
Partly agree, I think there was also an element of having something - anything - that neither of the other systems have (yet). vod will take a while to pay back as well. As I understand it from a post a while ago, it requires a substantial investment in equipment in each area, on top of the development cost. It's not guaranteed revenue, either; vod started here in Glasgow, and I think we've watched one item on it - and that was free!
Quote:
With sky+ coming upto 900,000 users and freeview pvr costing less than
4 months ntl subs time is running out for ntl.
We customers need a firm time scale for cable pvr.
Totally agree. Trouble is, if they say it'll be another year, that might scare away more customers than would have left otherwise.
KenK is offline   Reply With Quote