View Single Post
Old 17-10-2005, 19:31   #59
j52c
Inactive
 
j52c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: next door to my neighbour
Posts: 508
j52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant futurej52c has a brilliant future
Re: Dutch to ban the wearing of the Burka?

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyl
Leaving aside the contentious used of the word forced there were, according to the 2001 census, 6,247 people from ethnic minorities in Pendle and just under 31,000 in employment alone, so not sure where your claim to live in somewhere where the ethnic population has overtaken the "indigenous" comes from.
Those figures are out of date, we are almost the end of 2005, so please use uptodate figures al lot can happen in 5 years.

http://www.optimumpopulation.org/opt.action.html
The link makes very interesting reading, unless some people don't agree.
A quote from the page:-
'About two-thirds of annual population growth is directly due to excess immigration (more in than out), with one third due to natural increase (more births than deaths). If allowed to continue, according to the Office of National Statistics, more than 80% of future population growth will be due to net inward migration. The consequences of this scale of population growth can clearly be seen in plans to build at least a million new homes in the South-East, many of them on greenfield sites or suburban sites.'

Recently on the ITV Teletext Pages, there was an item which said that 60% of the children born in London during 2004 - 2005 were born to foreign mothers. (I will try and find the link)
Awaiting your comment.
j52c is offline   Reply With Quote