timewarrior2001

Ok this is a sensative thing, because this guy lives in the region I do.

However.....

1) He did NOT rape this woman, he was convicted of attempted rape on her
2) she suffered psychological injuries AFTER this happened.
3) since 1989 she had not thought to claim compensation, but because he suddenly gained a few million she decided that getting a share of that would miraculously make things better?

The judge was right, if the time limit is 6 years then the time limit is 6 years, it doesnt matter what happened. The law is written down why should it be different just because this convicted and time served rapist has won the lottery?
If she was allowed to sue him that would make a mockery of the law too as it would be making exceptions to the written law, and would open up a whole can of worms.
This guy as evil as he is has served his time, his debt to society is paid in the eyes of the law, if the system is not carefull they will end up on the wrong side of european law as the guy is being hounded.

To me its all jealousy that he was fortunate to win the lottery, would it even have made headlines if he hadnt? would he have been sued if he hadnt?
No its just sheer greed and jealousy that has motivated this.

__________________________________________________ ______________

Its like the double jeopardy law, A local woman Mrs Anne Ming is trying to overturn the law because of the murder of her daughter Julie hogg by a Mr Billy Dunlop. He was tried and found innocent, but has since confided in a prison officer that he did kill her. Why should the family not be able to receive justice? The answer is as awfull as it is that is the CURRENT LAW.
__________________________________________________ ______________
I understand that the crime ATTEMPTED on the victim of Mr Hoare was a terrible one, however he has received his punishment, he is publically outed as a rapist. Because he now happens to be a millionaire does not excuse people trying to make a mockery of the law, if this woman wanted to sue hiom she should have done so within the permitted 6 years. The Fact she didnt makes me believe that it is money orientated and thats just another name for Greed.

I stand by to be roasted in hell for this but I honestly 100% believe Mr Hoare should now be left alone. And this lady should be content with the criminal injuries compensation she will have received.
What makes her more special than thousands of other women that have been raped or the victim of an attempted rape, should they all have an indefinate period to sue just in case the perpetrator of the crime should make somehting of themselves?

£5000 criminal injuries, doesnt sound much does it, however When I was assaulted unprovoked when I was 13 I was awarded £750, since then and over 6 years after that happened I am now partially sited in one eye directly as a consequence of the assault and am likely to be blind in that eye later in life. I didnt have the option to pay back and go for more money, I have had mental problems associated with the violent attack, and if the guy that did it (and yes I still see him about) won the lottery I wouldnt expect to sue him.