Thread: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion (Part 3)
View Single Post
Old 12-10-2005, 11:06   #263
jrhnewark
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,267
jrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of society
Re: *ALL* ntl Cap Discussion (Part 3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
I am intrigued as to why when the upgrade schedule appears to be a best kept secret that this letter is informing people of their upgrade schedule.

Regarding upload on the 512k service. I've heard that it'll be the same as the original 512k service at 128k.
A most ludicrous situation - where do I sign? K/128k is far more realistic than 1024k/100k.

An unlimited 1-3Mbps package would suit me fine - unlimited 1Mbps (with more than 100k - say 256k) for £17.99 would keep me smitten.

If I could have, say 5Mbps down and 512kbps up with a 40GB allowance and a £25 price tag, I'd also be pretty smitten.

The range of options open to NTL are many - they just have to have the nouce to get the economists in and see what sort of packages they can come up with, whilst still being serious as a value for money proposition.
jrhnewark is offline