View Single Post
Old 30-09-2005, 12:16   #15
ZrByte
Inactive
 
ZrByte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wirral / Ex CWC Area
Age: 43
Posts: 3,251
ZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appeal
ZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appeal
Send a message via MSN to ZrByte
Re: Uninsured drivers face crackdown

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky
If a car(1) parked in front of it and car(2) hit your car , wich caused you car to hit car(1) car(1) would have to go through your insurance, if that makes sense
That does make sense though the reason I didnt think of that one was because I always thought it was the person who caused the accident in the first place who everybody would claim from, unless my vehicle was on the road and it was further driver error from myself that caused me to hit the next vehicle.
Now if I understood your example correctly you just mean that car (1) would go through my insurance either to claim off me so my insurance can claim off car (2) insurance or just go through my insurance company to claim from car (2). I just dont see why that is needed
ZrByte is offline   Reply With Quote