View Single Post
Old 29-09-2005, 02:59   #28
Graham
Inactive
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 61
Posts: 3,170
Graham has a nice shiny star
Graham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny star
Re: Virgin conception' first for UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Ask those who can't (for whatever reason) have children, but want offspring who are biologically related to them (ie not adopted).
Ivf still the womans egg donor sperm still hers carried by her but not a biological freak.
And what about babies who are conceived with donated eggs or donated sperm, but still biologically related to one parent?

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
How exactly is having babies *not* a right?

I've not heard of any cases of someone being *denied* the right to have babies, not even people who have eg congenital diseases, except in certain totalitarian regimes.
Its ment to be something that happens through procreation if it happens it happens.
Who says that it's "meant" to happen that way?

Just because it does in the majority of cases doesn't mean that other methods are somehow "not meant" to happen.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote